Legal Opinion
State v. Walton
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided August 3, 1993No. 14701; 14702; 14703PublishedCited by 149 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBorden, J.
The principal issue in these consolidated appeals is the extent to which we should recognize the principle of vicarious liability of a conspirator articulated in Pinkerton v. United States, 328 U.S. 640, 66 S. Ct. 1180, 90 L. Ed. 1489 (1946). The defendants, Scott Walton, Aubrey Johnson and Robert Walton, appeal1 from judgments of conviction, after a joint jury trial, of various narcotics offenses. Specifically, Scott Walton appeals from the judgment of conviction of one count of possession of narcotics with intent to sell by a person who is not drug-dependent in violation of General Statutes…
2Cases cited56 opinions
- Blockburger v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
- Pinkerton v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
- State v. GoldingSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1989
- Nye & Nissen v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
- California v. TybergSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
51 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by149 opinions
- State v. KitchensSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2011
- State v. WebbSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1996
- State v. PrioleauSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1995
- State v. BrownSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1995
- State v. PeelerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2004
144 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.