Legal Opinion

Chervon (HK) Limited v. One World Technologies, Inc.

District Court, D. Delaware

Decided February 14, 2025No. 1:19-cv-01293Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE CHERVON (HK) LTD., CHERVON NORTH AMERICA, INC., Plaintiffs, C.A. No. 19-1293-GBW v. ONE WORLD TECHNOLOGIES, INC., TECHTRONIC INDUSTRIES CO. LTD., HOMELITE CONSUMER PRODUCTS, INC., Defendants. MEMORANDUM ORDER Before the Court is an 02 Micro dispute over three terms: (1) “designated position,” which is recited in claim 8 of

U.S. Patent No. 9,596,806

(“the ’806 patent”) and claim 11 of

U.S. Patent No. 9,826,686

(“the ’686 patent”); (2) “designated rotating position,” which is recited in claim 13 of

U.S. Patent No. 10,485,176

(“the °176…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Edward H. Phillips v. Awh Corporation, Hopeman Brothers, Inc., and Lofton Corporation, Defendants-CrossCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2006
  2. Liebel-Flarsheim Company and Mallinckrodt Inc. v. Medrad, Inc., Defendant-CrossCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2004
  3. Comark Communications, Inc. v. Harris CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1998
  4. Samuel Gart v. Logitech, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2001
  5. MBO Laboratories, Inc. v. Becton, Dickinson & Co.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2007

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API