Legal Opinion
MBO Laboratories, Inc. v. Becton, Dickinson & Co.
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Decided January 24, 2007No. 2006-1062PublishedCited by 107 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
GAJARSA, Circuit Judge.
This appeal arises under the patent laws. Plaintiff MBO Laboratories, Inc. (“MBO”) appeals a summary judgment of noninfringement of U.S. Patent No. RE 36,885 (“the RE '885 patent”) granted by the United States District Court for the District of Massachusetts. After conducting a Markman hearing, the district court construed the various disputed claim terms. MBO Labs. v. Becton, Dickinson, & Co., 385 F.Supp.2d 88 (D.Mass.2005). MBO conceded that under the district court’s claim construction there was no infringement of the patent claims. The district court therefore…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- MARKMAN Et Al. v. WESTVIEW INSTRUMENTS, INC., Et Al.Supreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Edward H. Phillips v. Awh Corporation, Hopeman Brothers, Inc., and Lofton Corporation, Defendants-CrossCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2006
- Herbert Markman and Positek, Inc. v. Westview Instruments, Inc. And Althon Enterprises, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1995
- Vitronics Corporation v. Conceptronic, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1996
- Cybor Corporation v. Fas Technologies, Inc., and Fastar Ltd., Defendants-CrossCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1998
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by107 opinions
- Vita-Mix Corp. v. Basic Holding, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2009
- Verizon Services Corp. v. Vonage Holdings Corp.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2007
- Ge Lighting Solutions, LLC v. Agilight, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2014
- Central Admixture Pharmacy Services v. Advanced Cardiac SolutionsCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2007
- Revolution Eyewear, Inc. v. Aspex Eyewear, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2009
102 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.