Legal Opinion

Toledo, Wabash & Western Railway Co. v. Reynolds

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided June 15, 1874PublishedCited by 10 opinions

Writ of Error to the Circuit Court of Washington county; the Hon. Silas L. Bryan, Judge, presiding.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Scott

In 1872, L. Harx recovered a judgment in the circuit court of Washington county, against Eeynolds, on which execution was issued, and returned no property found. Harx then sued out a garnishee process against the railroad company, which was served on its agent in HcLean county. A plea to the jurisdiction of the court was filed, to which the court sustained a demurrer. Plaintiff in error having elected to stand by its plea, the court rendered final judgment against it for the amount of the judgment, in favor of Harx, against Eeynolds.

It is insisted a proceeding in garnishment is an original…

2Cited by10 opinions

  1. Nesbitt v. DickoverAppellate Court of Illinois · 1886
  2. Robbins, Coe, Rubinstein & Shafran, Ltd. v. Ro Tek, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1974
  3. Wieboldt Stores, Inc. v. SturdyIllinois Supreme Court · 1943
  4. Hughes v. Fort Dearborn National BankAppellate Court of Illinois · 1893
  5. Title Guarantee & Trust Co. v. Northwestern Theatrical Ass'nWashington Supreme Court · 1900

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API