Legal Opinion

Wieboldt Stores, Inc. v. Sturdy

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided September 24, 1943No. 27250. Judgment affirmedPublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Thompson

After the return of an execution “no property found and no part satisfied,” issued on a judgment for $76.20, obtained by confession in the municipal court of Chicago against Cyril C. Sturdy, the plaintiff, Wieboldt Stores, Inc., instituted garnishment proceedings in the municipal' court naming Oak Park Trust & Savings Bank as garnishee. Garnishee summons was directed to the sheriff of Cook county and was served by him on the bank. By special appearance, the garnishee moved to quash the service challenging the power of the municipal court to send its garnishment process beyond the territorial…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Zimek v. Illinois National Casualty Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1939
  2. Supreme Hive Ladies of the Maccabees of the World v. HarringtonIllinois Supreme Court · 1907
  3. First National Bank v. Hahnemann Institutions of Chicago, Inc.Illinois Supreme Court · 1934
  4. Gillman v. Chicago Railways Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1915
  5. Miller v. PeopleIllinois Supreme Court · 1907

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. White Way Sign & Maintenance Co. v. Seltzer Pontiac, Inc.Illinois Supreme Court · 1974
  2. Robbins, Coe, Rubinstein & Shafran, Ltd. v. Ro Tek, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1974
  3. Pinellas County v. Great American Management, & Investment, Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1991
  4. Oppenheim v. Circuit Court of the Eleventh Judicial CircuitIllinois Supreme Court · 1982
  5. United Biscuit Co. v. Voss Truck Lines, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1950

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API