Legal Opinion

Hughes v. Fort Dearborn National Bank

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided January 7, 1893PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Appeal from the Circuit Court of Cook County; the Hon. Francis Adams, Judge, presiding."

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Gary

The Joliet & Chicago Stone Company obtained a judgment against Hughes before a justice of the peace, on which an execution was issued and returned “ no property found.” Thereupon the stone company commenced garnishment proceedings upon that judgment in the Circuit Court.

The only question in the case is whether garnishment proceedings will lie in the Circuit Court upon a judgment of a justice of the peace. As such proceedings are purely statutory the answer depends upon what is the antecedent of the word 66 such ” in the several places where it occurs in the first section of the Garnishment…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Toledo, Wabash & Western Railway Co. v. ReynoldsIllinois Supreme Court · 1874
  2. Nesbitt v. DickoverAppellate Court of Illinois · 1886
  3. Home Insurance Co. of New York v. KirkAppellate Court of Illinois · 1887
  4. Merchant v. HowlandAppellate Court of Illinois · 1892

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Rand, McNally & Co. v. PomeroyAppellate Court of Illinois · 1894

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API