Legal Opinion
Robbins, Coe, Rubinstein & Shafran, Ltd. v. Ro Tek, Inc.
Appellate Court of Illinois
Decided October 8, 1974No. 59854PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Downing
This appeal is taken from an order of the circuit court denying gamishee-defendant-appellant First National Bank in Peru’s (hereinafter the bank’s) motion to dismiss or in the alternative to transfer to the circuit court for LaSalle County the garnishment proceedings initiated against it in the circuit court of Cook County by plaintiff-appellee Robbins, Coe, Rubenstein & Shafran, Ltd. (hereinafter plaintiff).
The sole issue presented for review is whether section 94 of title 12 1 of the United States Code applies to the situation where a national bank is a garnishee-defendant.
On March 28,…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Mercantile Nat. Bank at Dallas v. LangdeauSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- First Nat. Bank of Charlotte v. MorganSupreme Court of the United States · 1889
- Casey v. AdamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1880
- Michigan National Bank v. RobertsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Buffum v. Chase Nat. Bank of City of New YorkCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1951
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- In Re WeatherspoonUnited States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Illinois · 1989
- Bryant v. General Electric Credit Corp.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1986
- Nealis v. Ford Motor Credit Co. (In Re Nealis)United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Illinois · 1985
- People v. WilliamsAppellate Court of Illinois · 1976
- Deschauer v. HiltAppellate Court of Illinois · 1982
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.