Legal Opinion
Nool v. HomeQ Servicing
District Court, E.D. California
Decided September 4, 2009No. 1:09-CV-0885 OWW DLBPublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM DECISION RE BAR-CLAYS CAPITAL REAL ESTATE, INC. (erroneously sued as HOMEQ SERVICING) (DOC. 5).
OLIVER W. WANGER, District Judge.
I. INTRODUCTION
Barclays Capital Real Estate Inc. (“Bar-clays”), erroneously sued as HomeQ Servicing, moves to dismiss Jonathan A. and Arlene G. Nool’s (“Plaintiffs”) complaint pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 9(b) and 12(b)(6). Doc. 8. On May 4, 2009, Plaintiffs filed a complaint in Fresno County Superior Court, alleging ten causes of action under: (1) the Truth in Lending Act (“TILA”), 15 U.S.C. §§ 1610, et seq.; (2) California Civil Code §…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Jena Balistreri v. Pacifica Police Department Al Olsen, Police Chief, Individually and as a Police AgentCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
- Navarro v. BlockCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
- Vess v. Ciba-Geigy Corp. USACourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Jensen v. Quality Loan Service Corp.District Court, E.D. California · 2010
- Lal v. American Home Servicing, Inc.District Court, E.D. California · 2010
- Sipe v. Countrywide BankDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2010
- Altman v. PNC MortgageDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2012
- Clark v. Countrywide Home Loans, Inc.District Court, E.D. California · 2010
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.