Allred v. PIEDMONT WOODYARDS, INC.
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
BRITT, Judge.
By their first assignment of error defendants contend that the commission erred in determining that Dewey was an employee working jointly for Piedmont and Southern, in determining that defendant insurance carrier was estopped to deny that Dewey was acting as an employee of both alleged employers, and that Dewey was covered by workmen’s compensation insurance allegedly paid for by defendants Piedmont and Southern.
Defendants excepted to findings of fact 2 through 7 and to each of the conclusions of law. They argue that the challenged findings of fact are not supported by the…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Hayes v. . Elon CollegeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1944
- Aldridge v. Foil Motor CompanySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1964
- Ammons v. Z. A. Sneeden's Sons, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1962
- Smith Coal Co. v. FeltnerCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1953
- Pearson v. Newt Pearson, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1942
3Cited by6 opinions
- Godley v. County of PittSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1982
- Gaines v. L. D. Swain & Son, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1977
- Britt v. Colony Construction Co.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1978
- Garrett v. Garrett & Garrett FarmsCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1978
- Moore v. Upchurch Realty Co., Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1983
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.