Britt v. Colony Construction Co.

BRITT, Judge.

Appellants contend first that the Commission erred in determining that Britt was an employee of Utilities rather than of Colony, and in concluding that a contractor-subcontractor relationship existed between Colony and Utilities. We find no merit in these contentions.

“Upon review of an order of the Industrial Commission, this Court does not weigh the evidence, but may only determine whether there is evidence in the record to support the finding made by the Commission. Garmon v. Tridair In dustries, 14 N.C. App. 574, 188 S.E. 2d 523 (1972). If there is any evidence of substance…