Legal Opinion
Armstrong v. Resolution Trust Corp.
Illinois Supreme Court
Decided September 23, 1993No. 74592, 74605 consPublishedCited by 19 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Heiple
The current case, while on its face a run-of-the-mill tort action, is one of the multitude of cases which have acquired a complex personality due to the nationwide epidemic of savings and loan failures. This case presents two questions for resolution: (1) whether a State circuit court has concurrent jurisdiction once an administrative claim has been filed with the Resolution Trust Corporation (RTC), and (2) if so, whether the underlying claim in this case is barred under Federal law.
The details of this case are more thoroughly set forth in the opinion below. (234 Ill. App. 3d 162.) We review…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- D'Oench, Duhme & Co. v. Federal Deposit InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
- Langley v. Federal Deposit InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Gulf Offshore Co. v. Mobil Oil Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Luther E. Oliver Mary E. Oliver v. Resolution Trust Corporation, Receiver of Sooner Federal Savings & Loan Tandem Financial CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1992
- Guidry v. Resolution Trust Corp.District Court, E.D. Louisiana · 1992
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- People v. GreerIllinois Supreme Court · 2004
- Armstrong v. GuiglerIllinois Supreme Court · 1996
- Simard v. Resolution Trust Corp.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1994
- Federal Deposit Insurance v. O'MalleyIllinois Supreme Court · 1994
- Thomas v. Federal Deposit Insurance Corp.Supreme Court of Colorado · 2011
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.