Legal Opinion

Armstrong v. Guigler

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided October 18, 1996No. 79354PublishedCited by 69 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice McMORROW

In this case, we are asked to decide whether the 10-year statute of limitations for actions on a written contract (735 ILCS 5/13 — 206 (West 1992)), or the five-year statute of limitations for "all civil actions not otherwise provided for” (735 ILCS 5/13 — 205 (West 1992)), applies to a cause of action for breach of an implied fiduciary duty. A divided appellate court held that the implied duty at issue here was "created in a written document” and therefore the longer period of limitations controlled. 273 Ill. App. 3d 85. We granted leave to appeal (155 Ill. 2d R. 315) and now reverse the…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Rozny v. MarnulIllinois Supreme Court · 1969
  2. Schiro v. W. E. Gould & Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1960
  3. Havoco of America, Ltd., a Delaware Corporation, Cross-Appellee v. Sumitomo Corporation of America, and Elmer C. Hill, Cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1992
  4. Kinzer v. City of ChicagoIllinois Supreme Court · 1989
  5. Mitchell v. White Motor Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1974

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by69 opinions

  1. Bruno, D., Aplts. v. Erie InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2014
  2. Khan v. BDO Seidman, LLPAppellate Court of Illinois · 2011
  3. Fuller Family Holdings, LLC v. Northern Trust Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 2007
  4. Patrick Held v. Robert T. Held, Sr., Individually and as Trustee of Bodee Investment Trust Municipal Bond Portfolio of Patrick HeldCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1998
  5. John Doe A. v. Diocese of DallasIllinois Supreme Court · 2009

64 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API