Legal Opinion

Simard v. Resolution Trust Corp.

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided March 15, 1994No. 91-CV-1307, 91-CV-1359PublishedCited by 60 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KING, Associate Judge:

During the preliminary stage of these appeals from grants of summary judgment, both the Resolution Trust Corporation (“the RTC”), appellee in No. 91-CV-1307, and the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (“the FDIC”), appellee in No. 91-CV-1359, (collectively referred to as “the receivers”) filed motions to dismiss for lack of subject-matter jurisdiction. The motions were denied by a motions division of this court; however, the merits division informed the parties that the issue of subject-matter jurisdiction would be addressed at oral argument. 1 Because the effect of…

2Cases cited39 opinions

  1. D'Oench, Duhme & Co. v. Federal Deposit InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
  2. Langley v. Federal Deposit InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  3. Tafflin v. LevittSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  4. Gulf Offshore Co. v. Mobil Oil Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1981
  5. Nader v. De ToledanoDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1979

34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by60 opinions

  1. Daisley v. Riggs Bank, N.A.District Court, District of Columbia · 2005
  2. Bible Way Church of Our Lord Jesus Christ of Apostolic Faith of Washington v. BeardsDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1996
  3. Plesha v. FergusonDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2010
  4. In Re US Office Products Co. Securities Lit.District Court, District of Columbia · 2003
  5. In Re US Office Products Co. Securities Litigat.District Court, District of Columbia · 2003

55 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API