Legal Opinion

Federal Deposit Insurance v. O'Malley

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided October 27, 1994No. 76106PublishedCited by 34 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Nickels

This case involves an action by plaintiff, the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC), to enforce a guarantee signed by defendant, Michael J. O’Malley, in connection with a bank loan. The bank that made the loan subsequently failed. The FDIC then took control of the bank’s assets and found the guarantee in the bank’s files. At trial, O’Malley argued that the guarantee was invalid from the outset or, in the alternative, had been extinguished by the bank before the FDIC acquired the bank’s assets. The circuit court found, as a matter of law, that these defenses were barred by 12 U.S.C. §…

2Cases cited39 opinions

  1. D'Oench, Duhme & Co. v. Federal Deposit InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
  2. Langley v. Federal Deposit InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  3. United States v. John M. MurphyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1985
  4. Harold v. Beighley v. Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, Etc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1989
  5. Federal Deposit Insurance Corp. v. Henry E. McClanahanCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1986

34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by34 opinions

  1. People v. GaultneyIllinois Supreme Court · 1996
  2. Central Illinois Light Co. v. Home InsuranceIllinois Supreme Court · 2004
  3. People Ex Rel. Sherman v. CrynsIllinois Supreme Court · 2003
  4. Busch v. Graphic Color Corp.Illinois Supreme Court · 1996
  5. Hansen v. Baxter Healthcare Corp.Illinois Supreme Court · 2002

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API