Legal Opinion

State v. Richards

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided October 12, 1979No. 48643, 48644PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SCOTT, Justice.

Defendants, who were found guilty of charges of transporting uncased guns in a motor vehicle, a misdemeanor (Minn.St. 100.29, subd. 5, and 97.55, subd. 1), and illegal shining for wild animals, a gross misdemeanor (Minn.St. 100.29, subd. 10, and 97.55, subd. 9), contend on this appeal from judgment of conviction that the conservation officers violated their Fourth Amendment rights and that the evidence of their guilt of these offenses was legally insufficient. 1 We affirm.

Conservation officers, who had set up surveillance of a field near the St. Croix River for the purpose of…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Delaware v. ProuseSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. Pennsylvania v. MimmsSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  3. Cooper v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  4. State v. McKinleySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1975
  5. State v. McKinleySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1975

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. State v. SorensonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1989
  2. State v. SmithSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1981
  3. State v. TaylorCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1999
  4. State v. ColosimoCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2002
  5. State v. LarsenCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2001

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API