Legal Opinion

State v. Larsen

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided December 26, 2001No. C5-01-980PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

R.A. RANDALL, Judge.

The state challenges a pretrial order that dismissed charges of petty misdemeanor possession of marijuana and fishing with an extra line. The evidence to support those charges was obtained by a Minnesota conservation officer who entered and searched respondent’s ice-fishing house with no articulable suspicion, no probable cause, no search warrant, no- issue of hot pursuit, and the search and seizure did not come under any other exception. We conclude that an individual using an ice-fishing house for personal recreational purposes has a reasonable expectation of…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  3. Camara v. Municipal Court of City and County of San FranciscoSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  4. Dickerson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  5. Michigan Department of State Police v. SitzSupreme Court of the United States · 1990

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. State v. LarsenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2002
  2. State v. ColosimoCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2002

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API