State v. Larsen
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
R.A. RANDALL, Judge.
The state challenges a pretrial order that dismissed charges of petty misdemeanor possession of marijuana and fishing with an extra line. The evidence to support those charges was obtained by a Minnesota conservation officer who entered and searched respondent’s ice-fishing house with no articulable suspicion, no probable cause, no search warrant, no- issue of hot pursuit, and the search and seizure did not come under any other exception. We conclude that an individual using an ice-fishing house for personal recreational purposes has a reasonable expectation of…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Camara v. Municipal Court of City and County of San FranciscoSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Dickerson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Michigan Department of State Police v. SitzSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- State v. LarsenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2002
- State v. ColosimoCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2002