Legal Opinion

Barber v. Smith

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided July 5, 1943No. 30110PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGardner, J.

It appears that at the time the case was called for trial the defendant Barber and his counsel were absent without legal excuse. The trial court passed the orders on the demurrers and the plea during such absence. There are two questions for decision: Did the court err (a) in overruling the demurrer, and (b) in dismissing the plea of no partnership for want of prosecution?

It will be observed that the allegations as to partnership are that the defendants -"were joint contractors and copartners in certain contracts for the construction of portions of State Highway Boute Ho. 27 . . and during…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. American Cotton College v. Atlanta Newspaper UnionSupreme Court of Georgia · 1912
  2. Mims v. Brook & Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1907
  3. Roddenbery v. PattersonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1911
  4. Yancey v. KarwischSupreme Court of Georgia · 1907
  5. Loftis v. Allen Plumbing Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1936

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Perry v. Maryland Casualty Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1960
  2. Abe Gellman & Co. v. Jaco Pants, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1962
  3. Barber v. ShaderCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1943

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API