Legal Opinion

Perry v. Maryland Casualty Co.

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided September 29, 1960No. 38415PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Nichols, Judge.

The plaintiff contends, in support of certain of her grounds of demurrer, that the motion to set aside is defective because no brief of the evidence on the trial of the case was filed and since a brief of the evidence is an indispensable part of a motion to set aside a judgment based on a verdict, the motion was fatally defective. “ ‘Any motion to set aside a verdict, based on matters not appearing on the face of the record, is in effect a motion for a new trial and is subject to all the rules of law governing such motions.’ Ga. Ry. & Electric Co. v. Hamer, 1 Ga. App. 673 (2)…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Georgia Railway & Electric Co. v. HamerCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1907
  2. Anderson v. Fulton County Home BuildersSupreme Court of Georgia · 1917
  3. Stevens v. Wright Contracting Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1955
  4. Seaboard Air-Line Railway Co. v. JollySupreme Court of Georgia · 1925
  5. Donalson v. Bank of JakinCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1925

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Hill v. General Rediscount CorporationCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1967
  2. Barber v. Canal Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1969
  3. Wilson v. BarrowCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1963
  4. Adams v. MorganCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1966
  5. Siefferman v. KirkpatrickCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1970

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API