Legal Opinion
Loftis v. Allen Plumbing Co.
Court of Appeals of Georgia
Decided March 19, 1936No. 24886PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtMacIntyre, J.
In his petition as amended W. S. Loftis avers that Allen Plumbing Company and thirty-nine other defendants (some of them being designated as individuals, some by names importing partnerships, and many by names importing corporations) are defendants “individually and as members of an unin*844corporated association known as the Master Plumbers, Piping & Heating Contractors Association of Atlanta, and that .they are within the jurisdiction of this court. “Said defendants are jointly and severally indebted to your petitioner in the sum of . . $1500, plus interest at seven per cent., . . as rent .upon…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Crockett & Co. v. Garrard & Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1908
- American Cotton College v. Atlanta Newspaper UnionSupreme Court of Georgia · 1912
- Thurmond v. Cedar Spring Baptist ChurchSupreme Court of Georgia · 1900
- Jones v. WatsonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1879
- Wilkins v. Wardens & Vestry of St. Mark's Protestant Episcopal ChurchSupreme Court of Georgia · 1874
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Loftis v. Allen Plumbing Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1938
- Barber v. SmithCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1943
- Babb v. KershCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1955