Ammer v. Arizona Water Co.
Court of Appeals of Arizona
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
BROOKS, Presiding Judge.
Philip and Dolores Ammer appeal from a summary judgment quieting title to a parcel of real property in the Arizona Water Company (AWC). On appeal, they argue that the trial court erred in holding that it was necessary for them to show that they had exclusive possession of AWC’s property in order to establish a prescriptive easement. They also argue that the trial court erred in granting summary judgment when genuine issues of material fact existed. We reverse and remand for further proceedings.
FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY
In reviewing the trial court’s grant of…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Orme School v. ReevesArizona Supreme Court · 1990
- Solana Land Co. v. MurpheyArizona Supreme Court · 1949
- Deregibus v. Silberman Furniture Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1936
- Larue v. KosichArizona Supreme Court · 1947
- Suciu v. AMFAC Distributing Corp.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1983
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- Boccanfuso v. ConnerConnecticut Appellate Court · 2005
- Siler v. Arizona Department of Real EstateCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1998
- Strawberry Water Co. v. PaulsenCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2008
- Hauskins v. McGillicuddyCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1992
- Rogers v. Board of Regents of the University of ArizonaCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2013
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.