Legal Opinion

Winchester v. Haake

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided July 30, 1970PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

PEE CUEIAM.

The claimant-workman was injured in an accident while working on the construction of a house for defendant-owner. The sole issue before this court is whether claimant was an employe as he alleged, or an independent contractor as the defendant claimed.

The hearing officer found that pursuant to oral agreement claimant worked for defendant-owner in the construction of the house for $5.50 per hour. Claimant was an experienced builder and acted as “lead man” in the construction, but defendant-owner arranged for and paid employes to assist claimant, reserved the right to and did make…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Hannan v. Good Samaritan HospitalCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1970
  2. Hannan v. Good Samaritan HospitalCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1970
  3. Bowser v. State Industrial Accident CommissionOregon Supreme Court · 1947
  4. Butts v. State Industrial Accident CommissionOregon Supreme Court · 1951

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Seriganis v. FlemingCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1975

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API