Legal Opinion

Seriganis v. Fleming

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided March 24, 1975No. 404 888PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLee, J.

Respondent-claimant alleges that he sustained a back injury in the course of his employment. The referee denied the claim and was reversed on appeal to the Workmen’s Compensation Board. The Board was affirmed by the circuit court. Employer, Fleming, seeks reversal by this court. We affirm.

As the trial court stated in its opinion, “The sole issue for determination here is whether claimant suffered a compensable injury May 3, 1973.” On appeal, this issue has been raised and met on two fronts. First, Fleming argues that the evidence does not support a finding of compensable injury, relying…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Uris v. State Compensation DepartmentOregon Supreme Court · 1967
  2. Sahnow v. FIREMAN'S FUND INSURANCE COMPANYOregon Supreme Court · 1971
  3. Fredrickson v. GRANDMA COOKIE COMPANYCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1973
  4. Bicknell v. State Accident Insurance FundCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1972
  5. Winchester v. HaakeCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1970

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. United States Steel Corp. v. Industrial CommissionUtah Supreme Court · 1980
  2. Madewell v. Salvation ArmyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1980

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API