Morris Plan Industrial Bank v. Lassman
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
1Per curiam
The objection to the bankrupt’s discharge is because of a false financial statement made in November, 1937, upon which he borrowed from the obj ecting creditor. The false item was an entry upon the statement of “$75” in answer to the question "What is the total amount of your debts ? ” Four judgments had been entered against the bankrupt in 1932, aggregating more than $270, which were for dresses delivered to his wife, who was engaged in business, and lor whom he was a surety. His excuse was that “they were really no debts”; he “did not think they were debts”; they were “really my wife’s…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Lehigh Zinc and Iron Company v. BamfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1893
- In re RosenfeldCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1919
- Barnes v. Union Pac. Ry. Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1893
- Williams v. GreenCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1928
3Cited by7 opinions
- In the Matter of Charles Moore Bardwell, Jr., Bankrupts. Highland Village Bank v. Charles Moore Bardwell, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1980
- Yates v. BotelerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1947
- In re FinnCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1941
- Sovereign Pocohontas Co. v. BondCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1941
- M-A-C Loan Plan, Inc. v. CraneConnecticut Appellate Court · 1966
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.