Legal Opinion

Morris Plan Industrial Bank v. Lassman

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided December 23, 1940No. 138PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Per curiam

The objection to the bankrupt’s discharge is because of a false financial statement made in November, 1937, upon which he borrowed from the obj ecting creditor. The false item was an entry upon the statement of “$75” in answer to the question "What is the total amount of your debts ? ” Four judgments had been entered against the bankrupt in 1932, aggregating more than $270, which were for dresses delivered to his wife, who was engaged in business, and lor whom he was a surety. His excuse was that “they were really no debts”; he “did not think they were debts”; they were “really my wife’s…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Lehigh Zinc and Iron Company v. BamfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1893
  2. In re RosenfeldCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1919
  3. Barnes v. Union Pac. Ry. Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1893
  4. Williams v. GreenCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1928

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. In the Matter of Charles Moore Bardwell, Jr., Bankrupts. Highland Village Bank v. Charles Moore Bardwell, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1980
  2. Yates v. BotelerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1947
  3. In re FinnCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1941
  4. Sovereign Pocohontas Co. v. BondCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1941
  5. M-A-C Loan Plan, Inc. v. CraneConnecticut Appellate Court · 1966

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API