Legal Opinion
Yates v. Boteler
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided October 20, 1947No. 11444PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
GARRECHT, Circuit Judge.
On January 21, 1944, a representative from Dun & Bradstreet, Inc., a mercantile agency, called at the office of the Advance Welding Works, in Los Angeles, California, and asked the appellant, who owned and operated the establishment, to give him a financial statement.
The appellant refused to give a detailed financial statement, and told the representative that he had not been giving Dun & Bradstreet any reports and that he would rather not give any. Upon the insistence of the representative, the appellant finally gave round-figure estimates in response to certain…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Morimura, Arai & Co. v. TabackSupreme Court of the United States · 1929
- Morris Plan Industrial Bank v. HendersonCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1942
- Forbush Co. v. BartleyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1935
- In re Cloutier Bros.District Court, D. Maine · 1915
- Monson v. HiblerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1928
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Jerome Shainman v. Shear's of Affton, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1967
- Beneficial Consumer Discount Co. v. Barrett (In Re Barrett)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1980
- Cunningham v. Elco Distributors, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1951
- Howard E. Rogers, Doing Business as Howard E. Rogers Co. v. George Gardner, Trustee in Bankruptcy of the Estate of Howard E. Rogers, Etc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1955
- Beneficial Finance Company, Inc. v. GardacheLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1964
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.