Legal Opinion
In re Finn
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Decided April 10, 1941No. 7577PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BIGGS, Circuit Judge.
The bankrupt, Roy George Finn, is alleged by the appellant, The Morris Plan Industrial Bank of New York, to have made certain material false statements to it in connection with obtaining a loan for $675 and the appellant contends that for this reason the bankrupt is not entitled to his discharge, citing the provisions of Section 14, sub. c(3), of the Bankruptcy Act as amended, 52 Stat. 850, 11 U.S.C.A. § 32, sub. c(3). The appellant filed objections with the referee who overruled them and granted the discharge. Upon petition for review the District Court affirmed the…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Morimura, Arai & Co. v. TabackSupreme Court of the United States · 1929
- Woolen Corporation of America v. GitnigCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1929
- Morris Plan Industrial Bank v. LassmanCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1940
- Klecka v. Shuttles Bros. & Lewis, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1940
- In re LassmanDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1940
3Cited by15 opinions
- In the Matter of Martin M. Decker and Kathleen H. Decker, Individually and Jointly, Bankrupts. Appeal of Martin M. DeckerCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1979
- Morris Plan Industrial Bank v. ParkerCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1944
- In the Matter of Albert M. Barbato, Bankrupt, Royal Indemnity Company, a Corporation of the State of New York, a CreditorCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1968
- Pittsburgh National Bank v. Dee (In Re Dee)United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1980
- In re SavareseDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1944
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.