Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Wilmington

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided March 31, 1999PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

McEWEN, President Judge.

¶ 1 This Court granted the petition for reargument filed by the Commonwealth in this case to consider whether the Pennsylvania Constitution prohibits the random stopping of a Greyhound bus at a toll plaza on a rural interstate to permit police officers to conduct a “drug interdiction investigation” in the absence of reasonable suspicion or probable cause to believe that an *1162individual on the bus is transporting narcotics.

¶ 2 Our study, as well as our resolution of the competing concerns presented by this case — eradication of the deadly plague visited upon our society…

2Cases cited72 opinions

  1. Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  2. United States v. MendenhallSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  3. Delaware v. ProuseSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  4. Adams v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  5. Florida v. BostickSupreme Court of the United States · 1991

67 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. DeHartSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2000
  2. Commonwealth v. PhinnSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2000
  3. Commonwealth v. PoloSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2000
  4. Commonwealth v. WestSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2003
  5. Commonwealth v. RogersSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1999

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API