Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. DeHart

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided January 19, 2000PublishedCited by 86 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBrosky, J.

¶ 1 This is an appeal by the Commonwealth from an order granting Appellees’ suppression motion. The Commonwealth raises two questions for our consideration, which we restate as follows: when a police vehicle pulls alongside a vehicle which was already stopped of its own accord, is the ensuing questioning of the occupants a mere encounter or an investigative detention; does an investigative detention occur when a police officer gets out of his vehicle and approaches a vehicle, which was stopped of its own accord, to converse with the occupants? We affirm.

¶ 2 The facts relevant to our decision…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  2. Florida v. RoyerSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  3. Ohio v. RobinetteSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
  4. Commonwealth v. NesterSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1998
  5. Commonwealth v. LewisSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1994

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by86 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. JonesSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2005
  2. Commonwealth v. AuSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2012
  3. Commonwealth v. CollinsSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2008
  4. Commonwealth v. LuczkiSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2019
  5. Commonwealth v. EdwardsSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2018

81 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API