Commonwealth v. Polo
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
ZAPPALA, Justice.
This case presents the issue of whether the Pennsylvania Constitution prohibits the random stopping of a vehicle to conduct a drug interdiction investigation in the absence of reasonable suspicion or probable cause.1 We conclude that *221such a stop is unlawful under Article I, Section 8 of the Pennsylvania Constitution. For the following reasons, we affirm Superior Court’s order suppressing the evidence obtained during the course of the investigation.
On September 22,1995, a Greyhound bus on which Appellee was a passenger approached the tollbooth at the Delaware Water Gap…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Michigan v. LongSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Commonwealth v. EdmundsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1991
- Commonwealth v. SellSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
- Commonwealth v. MatosSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1996
- Commonwealth v. SwangerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1973
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by67 opinions
- In the Interest of D.M.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2001
- Commonwealth v. ChaseSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2008
- Jones v. City of PhiladelphiaCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2006
- Commonwealth v. SmithSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2003
- Commonwealth v. BeasleySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2000
62 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.