Legal Opinion

Æolian Co. v. Standard Music Roll Co.

U.S. Circuit Court for the District of New Jersey

Decided February 18, 1910PublishedCited by 5 opinions

In Equity. Suit by the Æolian Company against the Standard Music Roll Company and G. Howlett Davis. On motion to compel witness to answer certain questions.

1Opinion of the Court

RELLSTAB, District Judge.

The unanswered questions, 50 in number, were asked of the complainant’s witness Joseph Francis Meade, on cross-examination. This witness was called for the purpose of proving the record of sales made by the complainant of an instrument called the “metrostyle” and a statement of the aggregate of sales tabulated therefrom.

The examination in chief of this witness covers less than 4- typewritten pages, embracing but 18 questions, and relates entirely to his identity, business relationship to the complainant, his knowledge and custody of such sales record, the making of…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Blease v. GarlingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1876
  2. Resurrection Gold Min. Co. v. Fortune Gold Min. Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1904
  3. Wills v. RussellSupreme Court of the United States · 1880
  4. Montgomery v. Ætna Life Ins.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1899
  5. Thomson-Houston Electric Co. v. H. W. Johns Mfg. Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York · 1900

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Krametbauer v. McDonaldNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1940
  2. Heard v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1919
  3. Tucker v. PeilerCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1924
  4. Ferry-Hallock Co. v. Orange Hat Box Co.District Court, D. New Jersey · 1910
  5. Young v. Welch Mfg. Co.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 1912

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API