Legal Opinion
Tucker v. Peiler
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Decided March 10, 1924No. 251PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MANTON, Circuit Judge.
The appellees were engaged in examining as a witness one William H. Honiss of Plartford, Conn., in an interference proceeding now pending in the United States Patent Office to decide the question of priority of invention between them *571and the appellants, and which is referred to as Peiler v. Tucker and Reeves, No. 44,251. The invention relates to glass machinery, and more especially to apparatus for delivering lumps of viscous glass for subsequent fabrication by pressing or blowing machines. The proceeding is a consolidation of applications, two of which were filed by the…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Interstate Commerce Commission v. BrimsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1894
- Alexander v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1906
- Philadelphia & Trenton Railroad v. StimpsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1840
- Interstate Commerce Commission v. BairdSupreme Court of the United States · 1904
- Ellis v. Interstate Commerce CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1915
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Baush MacH. Tool Co. v. Aluminum Co. of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1933
- Meredith D. Shattuck and Ulo Vahtra (Ibm), Movants-Appellees v. Helmut Hoegl and Giacomo Barchietto (Xerox)Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1975
- Frederick C. Ochsner and Edwin A. Miller v. Walter R. MillisCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1967
- Thomas French & Sons, Ltd. v. International Braid Co.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1945
- Korman and Hogg v. Shull and Kita v. Nobile, Djerassi and Rosenkranz v. Korman and Hogg v. Shull and Kita v. Wilson v. NobileCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1962
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.