Legal Opinion

Young v. Welch Mfg. Co.

District Court, D. Massachusetts

Decided July 29, 1912No. 269PublishedCited by 1 opinion

'•In Equity. Suit by Samuel D. Young, trustee, against the Welch’ Manufacturing Company. On defendant’s motion for an order to compel. witness under examination to answer certain questions.

1Opinion of the Court

DODGE, Circuit Judge.

The bill in this case alleges infringement by the defendant of United States ’ letters patent No. 987,183, which the plaintiff claims to hold by assignment from the patentee, and asks for an injunction and an accounting. An answer and replication having been filed, the plaintiff’s testimony is being taken before a special examiner under an order of this court entered June 15, 1912, pursuant to the sixty-seventh equity rule.

' The present motion is made on the defendant’s behalf. It asks that Oscar F. Smith, a witness produced on behalf of the complainant in rebuttal, be…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Blease v. GarlingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1876
  2. Nelson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1906
  3. First Nat. Bank v. AbbottCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1908
  4. Dowagiac Mfg. Co. v. LochrenCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1906
  5. Missouri-American Electric Co. v. Hamilton Brown Shoe Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1908

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Tucker v. PeilerCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1924

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API