Legal Opinion

Blease v. Garlington

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided March 20, 1876No. 149PublishedCited by 90 opinions

Appeal from the Circuit Court of the United States for the District of South Carolina.

1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Waite

This suit Was brought for the foreclosure of a mortgage made by Blease to Garlington. The bill is in the ordinary form. Blease, in his answer, admits the execution of the note and mortgage, but insists, by way of defence, that Garlington “ deceived him as to the value of the consideration of the said note and mortgage, and has not complied with his positive agreement.” The history of the transaction, he says, is as follows: —

“The complainant, as the administrator of J. M. Young, deceased, held a large claim against the estate of John B. O’Neall, deceased, who had been the guardian of the said…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Conn v. PennSupreme Court of the United States · 1820
  2. Sickles v. Gloucester Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern Pennsylvania · 1856

3Cited by90 opinions

  1. Kougasian v. TMSL, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
  2. Nelson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1906
  3. Hughes v. ReedCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1931
  4. In Re Martin, Jr.Ohio Supreme Court · 1943
  5. Shubert v. WoodwardCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1909

85 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API