State v. Ternan
Washington Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtGrady, J.
The appellants were found guilty by a jury of the crime of assault in the second degree and, from the judgment entered on the verdict, have taken this appeal.
The appellants present four questions for our consideration: (a) that the information was not sufficient to charge assault in the second degree; (b) that certain instructions given by the court were erroneous; (c) that the court should have given a certain instruction proposed by appellants; (d) that it was error to receive testimony of witnesses in rebuttal as to the general reputation of the appellants for truth and veracity.(a) The…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- State v. DoddWashington Supreme Court · 1937
- State v. UnosawaWashington Supreme Court · 1948
- State v. FriedlanderWashington Supreme Court · 1926
- State v. RefsnesWashington Supreme Court · 1942
- State v. WrayWashington Supreme Court · 1927
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- State v. SwensonWashington Supreme Court · 1963
- State v. MesarosWashington Supreme Court · 1963
- State v. MoserWashington Supreme Court · 1952
- State v. BeckWashington Supreme Court · 1960
- State v. FinneganCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1972
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.