Legal Opinion

State v. Beck

Washington Supreme Court

Decided February 3, 1960No. 34636PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Per curiam

— One of the judges of this court disqualified himself from participating in the decision of this case. The eight remaining judges, after numerous conferences, are equally divided in their decision for the reasons appearing in the opinions filed.

There being no majority for affirmance or reversal, the judgment of the trial court stands.

It is so ordered.

Hill, J.

— This is an appeal from a judgment and sentence entered upon a verdict of guilty to a charge of grand larceny by embezzlement. Twenty-nine assignments of error raise a multiplicity of issues.

The trial itself, divorced from the…

2Cases cited76 opinions

  1. Hurtado v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1884
  2. United States v. Procter & Gamble Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1958
  3. Jencks v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  4. Pittsburgh Plate Glass Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
  5. Agnew v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1897

71 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Beck v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  2. State v. J-R Distributors, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1973
  3. State v. CarrollWashington Supreme Court · 1972
  4. State v. HawkinsWashington Supreme Court · 1967
  5. Myers v. HarterWashington Supreme Court · 1969

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API