Legal Opinion

State v. Friedlander

Washington Supreme Court

Decided November 3, 1926No. 20096. Department OnePublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFullerton, J.

The appellant, Curtis Friedlander, was convicted in the superior court of Grays Harbor county by the verdict of a jury of the offense of encouraging, causing and contributing to, the delinquency of a female child of the age of sixteen years. The appeal is from the judgment pronounced upon the verdict.

The offense, as it is denounced by the statute [Rem. Comp. Stat., §1987-17], is a misdemeanor and is an offense of which a justice’s court and the superior court have concurrent jurisdiction. The offense, however, is punishable by a fine not exceeding one thousand dollars, or by imprisonment in…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. State v. DuncanWashington Supreme Court · 1893
  2. Commonwealth v. RiceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1914
  3. State v. StuthWashington Supreme Court · 1895
  4. State v. AdamsWashington Supreme Court · 1917
  5. State v. WilliamsWashington Supreme Court · 1913

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. State v. HodgesOregon Supreme Court · 1969
  2. State v. FlinnWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1974
  3. State v. McKinleyNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1949
  4. Loveland v. State of ArizonaArizona Supreme Court · 1939
  5. City of Elizabethton v. Carter CountyTennessee Supreme Court · 1958

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API