Chaloupka v. State
Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
Opinion by
Justice GRANT.
Frank Michael Chaloupka was convicted of felony driving while intoxicated and sentenced to five years in the state penitentiary.
Chaloupka waived his right to jury by trial, and a bench trial was held. Chaloup-ka pleaded not guilty, but was found guilty by the judge. Chaloupka contends on appeal that there was insufficient evidence on which to convict him.
Chaloupka does not specify in his appeal whether he is challenging the legal sufficiency or the factual sufficiency. We may only consider the factual sufficiency of the evidence if the issue is properly raised.…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Clewis v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1996
- Houston v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1984
- Martinets v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1994
- Weaver v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1987
- Markey v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)1999
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by31 opinions
- Zavala v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District2002
- Scillitani v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2009
- Paschal v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)2000
- Betty A. Rios v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo)2010
- Betty A. Rios v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo)2010
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.