Legal Opinion

Zavala v. State

Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District

Decided September 12, 2002No. 13-99-671-CRPublishedCited by 68 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

ERRLINDA CASTILLO, Justice.

Appellant, Marcos Zavala, was convicted of driving while intoxicated in a trial before the court. After hearing the evidence, the trial court found him guilty and assessed punishment at 180 days in jail, probated for one year, and a $300.00 fine. In two points of error, appellant challenges the legal and factual sufficiency of the evidence to support the conviction. More particularly, appellant asserts that the State failed to prove that he operated a vehicle at any specific hour of the day while he was intoxicated. We affirm.

Factual Background

In late…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  3. Jackson v. DennoSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  4. Johnson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2000
  5. Clewis v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1996

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by68 opinions

  1. Kevin DWayne Kennemur v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo)2008
  2. Layland v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 9th District (Beaumont)2004
  3. Scillitani v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2009
  4. Weems v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 11th District (Eastland)2010
  5. Michael Channing McCann v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2014

63 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API