Legal Opinion

Scillitani v. State

Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)

Decided September 30, 2009No. 14-08-00430-CRPublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MAJORITY OPINION

KEM THOMPSON FROST, Justice.

Appellant Vincent Brassard Scillitani appeals his misdemeanor conviction for driving while intoxicated. In two issues, appellant claims the evidence is legally and factually insufficient to support his conviction and that the trial court erred in denying his motion to suppress evidence of the results of a breath test. Concluding that the evidence is legally insufficient, we reverse and render a judgment of acquittal.

I. Factual and Procedural Background

Trooper Patrick Hackney responded to a dispatch call at 1:58 a.m. involving a single-vehicle…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Wesbrook v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2000
  2. Sharp v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1986
  3. Matson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1991
  4. McDuff v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1997
  5. Paulson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2000

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Scillitani v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2011
  2. Nadal v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2011
  3. SCILLITANI v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2010
  4. Hughes v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 11th District (Eastland)2010
  5. Christopher Newberry v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2015

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API