Baltimore & Ohio R. R. v. Kane
Court of Appeals of Maryland
Two appeals in one record from the Baltimore Citjr Court. (Sopee', O. J.) The facts are stated in the opinion of the Court. The causes were argued together before Boyd, C. J., Briscoe, Burke,' Tttomas, Pattisoet, Ureter and Constable, JJ.
1Opinion of the CourtBurke, J.
The appellees on this record are the owners of a fee simple lot with improvements thereon located on the west side of Eutaw street in Baltimore City. The lot has a frontage of twenty-five feet on Eutaw street with a depth of about seventy-one feet to an alley three feet wide which runs north to Hamburg street. The plaintiffs have a right to the use of this alley in common with others. Access to the plaintiff’s property in the rear was had through the alley from Hamburg street—the property of the plaintiffs being located ninety-one feet from the south side of Hamburg street at its intersection…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Baltimore & Potomac Railroad v. ReaneyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1875
- Bradley v. New-York & New-Haven Rail-RoadSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1851
- Mayor of Cumberland v. WillisonCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1878
- Walters v. Baltimore & Ohio RailroadCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1913
- DeLauder v. County CommissionersCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1901
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Taylor v. Mayor of BaltimoreCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1917
- Krebs v. State Roads CommissionCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1931
- Powell v. Seaboard Air Line Railway Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1919
- Mayor of Baltimore v. HimmelfarbCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1937
- Maryland Port Administration v. QC Corp.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1987
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.