Walters v. Baltimore & Ohio Railroad
Court of Appeals of Maryland
Appeal from the Baltimore City Court (Harlan, O. J.). The facts are stated in the opinion of the Court.
1Opinion of the CourtStockbridge, J.
•In 1905 an ordinance was passed by the Mayor and City Council of Baltimore creating a commission to confer with representatives of the Baltimore and Ohio. Eailroad Company for the general purpose of abolishing numerous grade crossings of highways of the city in South Baltimore by the tracks of the Baltimore and Ohio Eailroad. The object to be accomplished was one of mutual benefit to the public at large and to the Eailroad Company. Humerous conferences appear to have been held between the members of this' Commission and persons representing-the Railroad, and the results of these conferences…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Haynes v. ThomasIndiana Supreme Court · 1855
- Lackland v. North Missouri RailroadSupreme Court of Missouri · 1860
- Witsen v. GutmanCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1894
- Reining v. New York, Lackawanna & Western Railway Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1891
- Lake Roland Elevated Railway Co. v. Mayor of BaltimoreCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1893
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by39 opinions
- Widgeon v. Eastern Shore Hospital CenterCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1984
- Taylor v. Mayor of BaltimoreCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1917
- Arnold v. Prince George's CountyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1973
- Krebs v. State Roads CommissionCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1931
- Irvine v. Montgomery CountyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1965
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.