Legal Opinion

Mayor of Baltimore v. Himmelfarb

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided June 16, 1937No. [No. 36, April Term, 1937.]PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBond, C. J.

The City appeals from a judgment at law at the suit of owners of a building on St. Paul Place, north of the Orleans Street Viaduct, in Baltimore, for damages from loss of value to the property by reason of deprivation of light and air, and invasion of dust and gases, consequent upon the erection and maintenance of the viaduct. The principal ground of controversy, submitted on a prayer for direction of a verdict in the City’s favor, is the right of the property owners to recover damages from the municipality for such injuries if proved.

The house is the second to the north of the viaduct, on…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Baltimore & Potomac Railroad v. ReaneyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1875
  2. Steuart v. Mayor of BaltimoreCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1855
  3. Mayor of Cumberland v. WillisonCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1878
  4. Krebs v. State Roads CommissionCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1931
  5. DeLauder v. County CommissionersCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1901

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Stevens v. City of SalisburyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1965
  2. Perellis v. Mayor of BaltimoreCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1948
  3. Krieger v. Planning CommissionCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1961
  4. Baltimore Gas & Electric Co. v. State Roads CommissionCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1957
  5. Lee's Inc. v. Transcontinental Underwriters of Transcontinental Ins.District Court, D. Maryland · 1949

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API