State v. Poole
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Appeals by defendants, Robert Poole and William Kerr, from separate judgments of the district court for Jackson county, Quinn, J., whereby they were convicted, under a joint indictment, of violation of the state game law. Affirmed as to defendant Poole.
1Opinion of the CourtStart, C. J.
The defendants were jointly indicted by the grand jury of the county of Jackson for having on September 28, 1903, in their possession two thousand wild ducks, with intent to sell them. They were tried together upon the indictment in the district court of the county of Jackson, and each was found guilty by the jury of having in his possession two thousand ducks, with intent to sell the same. Thereupon it was *149adjudged in the case of defendant Poole that he pay a fine of $20,000, and that he be imprisoned in the county jail until the fine is paid, not exceeding two hundred days. The judgment in…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- State v. RodmanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1894
- State v. O'NeilSupreme Court of Vermont · 1885
- Blydenburgh v. MilesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1872
- State v. LubeeSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1899
- State v. CraigSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1888
3Cited by5 opinions
- Harper v. GallowaySupreme Court of Florida · 1909
- State v. MoilenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1918
- State v. ShattuckSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1905
- State v. SullivanWashington Supreme Court · 1933
- State Ex Rel. Ohsman Sons Co. Inc. v. StarkweatherSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1943