Legal Opinion

State Ex Rel. Ohsman Sons Co. Inc. v. Starkweather

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided January 29, 1943No. 33,319PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Henrt M. Gallagher, Chief Justice.

This is a proceeding in mandamus to compel the director of the division of game and fish, state department of conservation, to issue a resident fur buyer’s license to Ohsman & Sons Company, an Iowa corporation, authorized to do business in this state and having a place of business in Mankato.

The petition upon which an alternative writ of mandamus issued alleges in part:

“III.
“That in January, 1942, pursuant to Chapter 410, the Laws of 1941, the relator sent to respondent an application for a resident fur buyer’s license together with a check for five dollars…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Geer v. ConnecticutSupreme Court of the United States · 1896
  2. Patsone v. PennsylvaniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
  3. Williams v. FearsSupreme Court of the United States · 1900
  4. New York Ex Rel. Silz v. HesterbergSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
  5. Ward v. Race HorseSupreme Court of the United States · 1896

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. State v. SuessSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1952
  2. Dodgen v. DepuglioTexas Supreme Court · 1948
  3. Manpower, Inc. v. Commissioner of RevenueSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2006
  4. Brownsville Shrimp Co. v. MillerCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1947
  5. In re Estate of CleggCourt of Appeals of Iowa · 2024

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API