Blydenburgh v. Miles
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Action on the statutes of 1868 and 1872 “ for encouraging and regulating fisheries,” brought to the city court of the city of New Haven.
Read the full summary
Action on the statutes of 1868 and 1872 “ for encouraging and regulating fisheries,” brought to the city court of the city of New Haven. The statute of 1868 is as follows : — “ Every person, partnership or corporation that shall permit or allow any coal tar, or refuse from the manufacture of gas, or refuse from establishments operated to extract oil from white-fish, or other deleterious substances to clams, oysters, eels and fish, to run, flow, drain or be placed in any of the harbors, rivers, creeks, arms of the sea, or waters adjacent to this state, shall forfeit the sum of one hundred…
1Opinion of the CourtCarpentbR, J.
This action is brought on the statutes of 1868 and 1872, which are sufficiently set out in the statement of the case. There are three counts in the declaration. The first alleges that the defendants were carrying on, in an establishment operated to extract oil from white-fish, and other purposes, the business of manufacturing oil and manure from fish, and of manufacturing artificial manures; and that they permitted and allowed the liquids and materials used *493and produced in, said establishment and business, and the refuse from said establishment, to run, flow, &c., into Milford Harbor. The…
2Cited by11 opinions
- State v. MainSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1897
- State v. NelsonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1940
- State v. RodmanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1894
- Lapinski v. CopacinoSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1944
- Second National Bank of New Haven v. LoftusSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1936
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.