Legal Opinion

People ex rel. Ostapow v. Fidelity & Casualty Co.

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided March 22, 1923No. Docket No. 112PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFellows, J.

Armin Weinberger, who did business in Detroit under the name of Weinberger & Ziegler, desiring to engage in the business of selling foreign steamship tickets and to receive' the certificate of the commissioner of banking of the State authorizing him so to do as provided by Act No. 271, Pub. Acts 1915, as amended by Act No. 399, Pub. Acts 1919, applied to such commissioner for such certificate, tendering a bond in proper form with defendant Fidelity & Casualty Company of New York, a surety *297company, as surety. As the bond bore date January 13, 1921, we need not consider the act as rewritten by…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Daniels v. TearneySupreme Court of the United States · 1880
  2. Interstate Consolidated Street Railway Co. v. MassachusettsSupreme Court of the United States · 1907
  3. Grand Rapids & Indiana Railway Co. v. OsbornSupreme Court of the United States · 1904
  4. Shaughnessy v. American Surety Co.California Supreme Court · 1903
  5. Samuels v. CouzensMichigan Supreme Court · 1921

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Spencer v. Consumers Oil Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1932
  2. American Life Insurance Co. v. BalmerMichigan Supreme Court · 1927
  3. Flanigan v. Reo Motors, Inc.Michigan Supreme Court · 1942
  4. Brown v. TrudellMichigan Supreme Court · 1924
  5. Collins v. GerhardtMichigan Supreme Court · 1926

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API