Legal Opinion

American Life Insurance Co. v. Balmer

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided June 6, 1927No. Docket No. 96PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFellows, J.

(after stating the facts). There is much force in defendant’s contention that the proceedings under the workmen’s compensation act are res adjudicata and may not be collaterally attacked as is sought to be done in the instant case. In Lumbermen’s Mutual Casualty Co. v. Bissell, 220 Mich. 352 (28 A. L. R. 874), this court held that the. doctrine of res adjudicata was applicable to the award of the (then) board like the award of arbitrators as well as to judgments and decrees in judicial proceedings. Such award like awards of arbitrators may be set aside for fraud. Smith v. Port Huron Gas &…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. New York Central Railroad Company v. WhiteSupreme Court of the United States · 1916
  2. Cudahy Packing Co. Of Nebraska v. ParramoreSupreme Court of the United States · 1924
  3. Mountain Timber Company v. State of WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1916
  4. Daniels v. TearneySupreme Court of the United States · 1880
  5. Middleton v. Texas Power & Light Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1919

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Demay v. Liberty Foundry Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1931
  2. Luyk v. HertelMichigan Supreme Court · 1928
  3. Ayers v. GenterMichigan Supreme Court · 1962
  4. Panozzo v. Ford Motor Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1931
  5. Peters v. Michigan State CollegeMichigan Supreme Court · 1948

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API