Collins v. Gerhardt
Michigan Supreme Court
1ConcurrenceFellows, J.
(concurring.) I am fully in accord with the opinion of Mr. Justice McDonald in this case. But for the importance of the case both to public and private interests, and the fact that an exhaustive opinion in dissent has been prepared, I should content myself with signing that opinion. My views on the subject here involved are, however,' pronounced, and I desire to deal with certain phases of it at some length. I shall not take time or space in discussing the question of whether Pine River is a navigable stream. That question was submitted to the jury in a charge not complained of, which…
2Cases cited43 opinions
- Shively v. BowlbySupreme Court of the United States · 1894
- United States v. Chandler-Dunbar Water Power Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1913
- Hardin v. JordanSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
- Manchester v. MassachusettsSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
- Brickell v. TrammelSupreme Court of Florida · 1919
38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.