Legal Opinion
State v. City Court
Court of Appeals of Arizona
Decided June 25, 1981No. 2 CA-CIV 3926PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
HOWARD, Judge.
The issue in this case is whether the Tucson city magistrate abused his discretion in setting aside appellant’s guilty plea. The Pima County Superior Court, in a special action filed by the city, found that he did and ordered the magistrate to reinstate the guilty plea. Appellant claims the superior court erred. We affirm.
On January 4, 1980, appellant, who was represented by counsel, pled guilty in city *257court to reckless driving. He later became aware that his driver’s license was going to be suspended pursuant to A.R.S. § 28-445(6) because within the 24 months preceding…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- United States v. Peter A. Crusco and Phillip A. Cimmino. Appeal of Phillip CimminoCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1976
- Americo Michel v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1974
- United States v. DavisCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1954
- Ralph Masciola v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1972
- State v. YoungArizona Supreme Court · 1975
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- State v. City Court of City of TucsonArizona Supreme Court · 1981
- State v. City Court of City of TucsonArizona Supreme Court · 1981
- State v. HicksPalm Beach County Court · 1987