State v. City Court of City of Tucson
Arizona Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
CAMERON, Justice.
We granted this petition for review to correct what we believe to be a mistake of law concerning the discretion of the Tucson City Court in granting a motion to withdraw a plea of guilty. We have jurisdiction pursuant to A.R.S. § 12-120.24 and Rule 31.19, Arizona Rules of Criminal Procedure, 17 A.R.S.
The facts necessary for a determination of this matter are as follows. In January Í980, the real party in interest, Ervin Krist, represented by counsel, pled guilty to the charge of reckless driving in the City Court of The City of Tucson. Because he had a previous conviction for…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- State v. CorveloArizona Supreme Court · 1962
- Silver v. StateArizona Supreme Court · 1931
- State v. MurrayArizona Supreme Court · 1966
- State v. City CourtCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1981
3Cited by10 opinions
- Martin v. ReinsteinCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1999
- State v. RiveraArizona Supreme Court · 2005
- State v. DockeryCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1991
- State v. LamasArizona Supreme Court · 1985
- State v. LamasCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1983
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.