Legal Opinion

Ward v. Thompson Heights Swimming Club, Inc.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided October 15, 1975No. 7515SC359PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MARTIN, Judge.

Plaintiff assigns as error the allowance of defendant’s motion for directed verdict on plaintiff’s claim for damages.

On a motion for a directed verdict by the defendant, the court must consider the evidence in the light most favorable to the plaintiff, and may grant the motion only if, as a matter of law, the evidence is insufficient to justify a verdict for the plaintiff. G.S. 1A-1, Rule 50(a), Rules of Civil Procedure; Adler v. Insurance Co., 280 N.C. 146, 185 S.E. 2d 144 (1971) ; Kelly v. Harvester Co., 278 N.C. 153, 179 S.E. 2d 396 (1971) ; Younts v. Insurance Co., 281 N.C.…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Kelly v. International Harvester CompanySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1971
  2. Lutz Industries, Inc. v. Dixie Home StoresSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1955
  3. Norburn v. MacKieSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1964
  4. Mattingly v. NORTH CAROLINA RAILROAD COMPANYSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1961
  5. Younts v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1972

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. City of Greensboro v. Reserve Insurance Co.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1984
  2. Chrysler Credit Corp. v. BurtonDistrict Court, M.D. North Carolina · 1984
  3. Greensboro Housing Authority v. Kirkpatrick & Associates, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1982
  4. Sibbett v. M.C.M. Livestock, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1978
  5. Chastain v. Litton Systems, Inc.District Court, W.D. North Carolina · 1981

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API