Ward v. Thompson Heights Swimming Club, Inc.
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
MARTIN, Judge.
Plaintiff assigns as error the allowance of defendant’s motion for directed verdict on plaintiff’s claim for damages.
On a motion for a directed verdict by the defendant, the court must consider the evidence in the light most favorable to the plaintiff, and may grant the motion only if, as a matter of law, the evidence is insufficient to justify a verdict for the plaintiff. G.S. 1A-1, Rule 50(a), Rules of Civil Procedure; Adler v. Insurance Co., 280 N.C. 146, 185 S.E. 2d 144 (1971) ; Kelly v. Harvester Co., 278 N.C. 153, 179 S.E. 2d 396 (1971) ; Younts v. Insurance Co., 281 N.C.…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Kelly v. International Harvester CompanySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1971
- Lutz Industries, Inc. v. Dixie Home StoresSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1955
- Norburn v. MacKieSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1964
- Mattingly v. NORTH CAROLINA RAILROAD COMPANYSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1961
- Younts v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1972
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- City of Greensboro v. Reserve Insurance Co.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1984
- Chrysler Credit Corp. v. BurtonDistrict Court, M.D. North Carolina · 1984
- Greensboro Housing Authority v. Kirkpatrick & Associates, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1982
- Sibbett v. M.C.M. Livestock, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1978
- Chastain v. Litton Systems, Inc.District Court, W.D. North Carolina · 1981